{"id":459,"date":"2015-01-19T00:45:28","date_gmt":"2015-01-19T01:45:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.skinlabhk.com\/?p=459"},"modified":"2025-06-20T10:32:56","modified_gmt":"2025-06-20T10:32:56","slug":"aggressive-fitment-needs-to-die","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.skinlabhk.com\/index.php\/2015\/01\/19\/aggressive-fitment-needs-to-die\/","title":{"rendered":"Aggressive Fitment Needs To Die"},"content":{"rendered":"

Almost daily I see people blame stance (99% of the time they actually mean aggressive fitment, but that’s another discussion for another day) for the downfall of the automotive community as a whole.<\/p>\n

Proclamations are made that once the ‘fitment fad’ dies off everything will miraculously change for the better.<\/p>\n

\"pfaff-tuning-scraped-crusaders-nissan-350-3\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Really? We’re using aggressive fitment as the scapegoat for all the problems that exist among enthusiasts today, while completely ignoring the fact that less than functional wheel, tire, and suspension setups are nothing new?<\/p>\n

If you jump back forty plus years –conveniently hopping over the “ricer era” that is its own can of worms– and examine the ‘70’s Street Machine<\/a> movement you will observe that people have been choosing their wheel and tire set-ups based on looks for years.<\/p>\n

It just so happens that currently a significant portion of the community views pebble pushing ride height,  low offset wheels, stretched tires, and ample camber as pleasing to the eye.<\/p>\n

\n